Skip to main content

GNSS helping Synchrophasors keep Power Grids Stable

As we have started converting more wind, solar and other forms of energy to electricity, there is more supply that ever available previously.  Similarly we are also consuming more power than ever. Electric cars for example consume a lot of energy. In addition we have more electronic gadgets that we keep connected to chargers, regardless of weather they need charging or not. 

At every instant of time, the power fed in the grid has to be consumed or stored somewhere. In addition, it has to be ensured that the amplitude, frequency and phase remains constant. This is where Synchrophasors come into play. The video below, explains it in a simple way what they are: 

u-blox has a nice write-up on this topic explaining why this is important. 

Improvements in terms of timing accuracy have come in lock-step with improvements in positioning accuracy. The u‑blox F9 GNSS receiver platform, which brought scalable and affordable high precision positioning – down to the decimeter-level – to the mass market, also greatly improved timing accuracies, using a new generation of multi-constellation, multi-band high accuracy GNSS receivers. This has made five nanosecond timing accuracy for absolute time – even less for relative time –  available to industrial applications at a fraction of the cost of wired timing and synchronization solutions.

One application with increasingly demanding timing needs is the power grid. A growing proportion of our power is produced using highly intermittent sources such as wind and sunlight. At the same time, the applications that we are powering are changing too, from predominantly resistive loads (that extract work through resistive heating, for example) to capacitive loads (that extract work via a capacitor, as used to convert from AC to DC).

These changes make managing power grids more challenging. For one, grid managers need to ensure that, at each instant, the power fed into the grid is consumed somewhere. When passing clouds and gusts of wind can dial up and down power production from one instant to the next, this is far from obvious. Then, capacitive loads (like inductive loads, the third of the cohort) lead to a phase shift between voltage and current, which, in turn, can lead to instabilities that have to be managed.

That’s why synchrophasors, also referred to as phase management units, have become indispensable in modern power grids. Synchrophasors monitor the phase across portions of the power grid to detect the onset of system-wide oscillations that could threaten the grid’s stability. To extract meaningful data, the synchrophasor’s sampling frequency needs to be higher than the grid’s 50 Hz pulse, and it has to be synchronized to all other sychrophasors with microsecond-level relative timing accuracies.

But what if there’s a bug, e.g. a short circuit, in the power grid that shuts down a portion of the network? Being able to locate the fault is vital to bringing service back up quickly. The more accurately it can be located, the more targeted the intervention by the service technicians will be. 100 nanosecond relative timing accuracy between adjacent traveling wave detectors is sufficient to pin down faults to within 30 meters. 

Wireless timing and synchronization is gaining traction in a growing number of industrial verticals. Fast production lines in smart factories need tight synchronization, as do data networks in time-sensitive financial applications such as high-frequency trading. GNSS-enabled wireless timing offers an easy-to-deploy, low-cost timing solution that is traceable to coordinated universal time (UTC).

More details here.


Popular posts from this blog

Laser Inter-Satellite Links (LISLs) in a Starlink Constellation

When we first talked about Starlink back in 2019 , we saw in the video that the concept involved laser communication to communicate between the satellites. While the initially launched satellites did not have the laser communication mechanism built in, it looks like they are being added to the newer ones.  A report from Fast Company in late 2021 said: One of the next big upgrades in telecom will involve satellites firing lasers at each other—to beam data, not blow stuff up. The upside of replacing traditional radio-frequency communication with lasers, that encode data as pulses of light, can be much like that of deploying fiber-optic cable for terrestrial broadband: much faster speeds and much lower latency. “Laser links in orbit can reduce long-distance latency by as much as 50%, due to higher speed of light in vacuum & shorter path than undersea fiber,” SpaceX founder Elon Musk tweeted in July about the upgrade now beginning for that firm’s Starlink satellite constellation. The

IEEE 802.11bn Ultra High Reliability (UHR), a.k.a. Wi-Fi 8

Back in 2020 we looked at the introductory post of Wi-Fi 7 which was followed up by a more detailed post in Feb 2022. We are now following on with an introductory post on the next generation Wi-Fi.  A new paper on arXiv explores the journey towards IEEE 802.11bn Ultra High Reliability (UHR), the amendment that will form the basis of Wi-Fi 8. Quoting selected items from the paper  below: After providing an overview of the nearly completed Wi-Fi 7 standard, we present new use cases calling for further Wi-Fi evolution. We also outline current standardization, certification, and spectrum allocation activities, sharing updates from the newly formed UHR Study Group. We then introduce the disruptive new features envisioned for Wi-Fi 8 and discuss the associated research challenges. Among those, we focus on access point coordination and demonstrate that it could build upon 802.11be multi-link operation to make Ultra High Reliability a reality in Wi-Fi 8. The IEEE 802.11bn UHR: Whose Study Gro

CSI-RS vs SRS Beamforming

In an issue of Signals Flash by Signals Research Group (SRG), they talked about 2 different types of MIMO. Quoting from their journal, "CSI-RS versus SRS. Those operators that have tested or made token use of MU-MIMO leverage a flavor of MU-MIMO that is based on CSI-RS. The MU-MIMO network we tested was based on SRS, which makes it far more likely to observe sixteen spatial layers (versus eight)." I reached out to Emil Bj√∂rnson, Visiting Professor at KTH Royal Institute of Technology and Associate Professor at Link√∂ping University to see if he has explained this in any of his videos. Here is what he said: " I'm not talking about 3GPP terminology in any of my videos. But you can listen to the slides that starts around 12:40 in this video (embedded below) . If you are looking for CSI-RS vs SRS based MU-MIMO, then jump to around 12:40 in this video where you can see CSI-RS being referred to as "grid of beams" and SRS is similar to the other option, which is t