Skip to main content

Ericsson Explains Internet of Drones and 3GPP UAV Roadmap

The last time we looked at 3GPP's plan for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) was over a year and half back. Since then the standards have made loads of progress, with features for 5G-Advanced, a.k.a. Release-18, just being discussed.

In a recent blog post, Xingqin Lin, Master Researcher, radio at Ericsson presented a retrospective of their “Sky is Not the Limit” journey (see IEEE article here) and an outlook of the next few years about connected drones. Quoting from the blog post:

A journey began with 3GPP Rel-15 standardization

In early 2016, we identified that one key area to study in the 3GPP Release 15 was to enable mobile network connected drones, based on our research work (some of which was later made public in the "Sky is Not the Limit" seminal paper).

In December 2016, we submitted a new study item proposal on Enhanced LTE Support for Aerial Vehicles to the 3GPP RAN plenary meeting #74. The proposal attracted much interest, leading to the approval of the study item at the 3GPP RAN plenary meeting #75 in March 2017. The study item was supported by 35 members in 3GPP, and Ericsson and NTT DOCOMO together served as the study item rapporteurs.

The 3GPP study assessed the performance of LTE networks supporting aerial vehicles with up to the 3GPP Release 14 functionality. The study was completed in December 2017 and the outcomes were documented in the 3GPP technical report TR 36.777 including comprehensive analysis, evaluation, and field measurement results. The 3GPP TR 36.777 has become a definitive guide for mobile network connected drones, and has been widely cited by academia, industry, and regulatory organizations.

The 3GPP study concluded that it is feasible to use existing LTE networks to provide connectivity to drones, but there may be challenges related to interference as well as mobility. The challenges become more visible when the density of drones is high. Both implementation and specification-based enhancements were identified during the 3GPP study to address these issues.

After completing the study item, a follow-up work item was approved at the 3GPP RAN plenary meeting #78 in December 2017. Ericsson served as the rapporteur of the work item. The objective of the work item was to specify features that can improve the efficiency and robustness of terrestrial LTE network for delivering more efficient connectivity solutions for drones. This 3GPP work item was completed in June 2018.

In addition to the 3GPP Release 15 work on LTE Aerials in RAN, 3GPP SA studied the remote identification of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) in Release 16, and continues to investigate more aspects including connectivity, identification, tracking, application layer support, and security in Release 17.

A journey moves beyond 3GPP

After the completion of the 3GPP Release 15 work on connected drones, we have seen a surge of field trials for connected drones around the globe by major operators and vendors. Various industry organizations such as GSMA and CTIA have set up special drone interest groups to develop new use cases and help create an open and trusted regulatory environment. Besides, GSMA and GUTMA have been cooperating to align mobile and aviation industries.

The world has also witnessed growing efforts from governments to safely integrate civil and public drone operations into airspace systems. One exemplary effort is the UAS Integration Pilot Program (IPP) in the US. The IPP was concluded in October 2020, after which the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) launched a new program called BEYOND to continue work on the remaining challenges of UAS integration.

We at Ericsson have been contributing to the relevant forums to align mobile network capabilities with drone communication and traffic management requirements. Ericsson is a full member of the Open Generation Consortium (Open Gen), which initially focuses on use cases related to operating 5G-equipped drones over the United States.

We have also seen much increased momentum in academic research in this area, which led to the creation of the IEEE Communications Society Emerging Technologies Initiative on Aerial Communications and the IEEE Vehicular Technology Society Ad Hoc Committee on Drones. We have been contributing to both initiatives since they were created.

Recently, under the NSF PAWR Industry Consortium program, Ericsson contributed cutting-edge equipment to the Aerial Experimentation and Research Platform for Advanced Wireless (AERPAW) testbed platform for 5G application testing. The AERPAW platform is designed for experimentation with drone communications. This work will accelerate research and commercialization of connected drones.

Guvenc, director of the NSF AERPAW project, said: “Our NSF AERPAW project team has been working closely with Ericsson engineers to deploy a 4G/5G NSA wireless network in Raleigh. This Ericsson network will be used by the broader wireless community in the US for advanced wireless experiments with drones. The AERPAW team is grateful to Ericsson for their help and support for academic research.”

Towards the Internet of Drones and 6G

Wide-area network coverage is needed to safely expand drone operations for beyond visual line-of-sight missions. Mobile networks can provide secure wide-area wireless connectivity, utilizing proven technology based on mobile licensed spectrum and global standards.

Already today, LTE networks can support the initial deployment of low-altitude drones. The significantly improved capabilities of 5G networks will provide more efficient and effective mobile connectivity for large-scale drone deployments with more diverse applications. As 5G rollouts continue to gather momentum worldwide, network complexity and site numbers will grow. Connected drones in turn can help to accelerate site deployment and rollout while reducing health and safety hazards, as explained for example in the blog post Afraid of heights? Drones, AI and digitalization to the rescue!.

To further improve the 5G networks' capabilities to serve drones, we are driving the introduction of drone-related enhancements to Release 18 of the 5G NR standard. Our vision is that NR networks will become even more capable of serving drones compared to LTE networks.

The future of a connected sky with drones is exciting, despite the challenges we need to overcome on the path to 6G. To mention a recent inspiring example, the NASA’s Perseverance rover carrying a drone helicopter landed on Mars on February 18, 2021. Perhaps it is now time for researchers to consider interplanetary drone communications and networking.

As we continue the “Sky is Not the Limit” journey towards 6G, we will remain committed to working actively in the relevant forums to align mobile network capabilities with drone communication and traffic management requirements.

You can read the complete blog post here.

You can also read this recent article [PDF], "Towards 6G with Connected Sky: UAVs and Beyond" to find out how the connected sky will look like towards 6G.

Related Posts

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Laser Inter-Satellite Links (LISLs) in a Starlink Constellation

When we first talked about Starlink back in 2019 , we saw in the video that the concept involved laser communication to communicate between the satellites. While the initially launched satellites did not have the laser communication mechanism built in, it looks like they are being added to the newer ones.  A report from Fast Company in late 2021 said: One of the next big upgrades in telecom will involve satellites firing lasers at each other—to beam data, not blow stuff up. The upside of replacing traditional radio-frequency communication with lasers, that encode data as pulses of light, can be much like that of deploying fiber-optic cable for terrestrial broadband: much faster speeds and much lower latency. “Laser links in orbit can reduce long-distance latency by as much as 50%, due to higher speed of light in vacuum & shorter path than undersea fiber,” SpaceX founder Elon Musk tweeted in July about the upgrade now beginning for that firm’s Starlink satellite constellation. The

IEEE 802.11bn Ultra High Reliability (UHR), a.k.a. Wi-Fi 8

Back in 2020 we looked at the introductory post of Wi-Fi 7 which was followed up by a more detailed post in Feb 2022. We are now following on with an introductory post on the next generation Wi-Fi.  A new paper on arXiv explores the journey towards IEEE 802.11bn Ultra High Reliability (UHR), the amendment that will form the basis of Wi-Fi 8. Quoting selected items from the paper  below: After providing an overview of the nearly completed Wi-Fi 7 standard, we present new use cases calling for further Wi-Fi evolution. We also outline current standardization, certification, and spectrum allocation activities, sharing updates from the newly formed UHR Study Group. We then introduce the disruptive new features envisioned for Wi-Fi 8 and discuss the associated research challenges. Among those, we focus on access point coordination and demonstrate that it could build upon 802.11be multi-link operation to make Ultra High Reliability a reality in Wi-Fi 8. The IEEE 802.11bn UHR: Whose Study Gro

CSI-RS vs SRS Beamforming

In an issue of Signals Flash by Signals Research Group (SRG), they talked about 2 different types of MIMO. Quoting from their journal, "CSI-RS versus SRS. Those operators that have tested or made token use of MU-MIMO leverage a flavor of MU-MIMO that is based on CSI-RS. The MU-MIMO network we tested was based on SRS, which makes it far more likely to observe sixteen spatial layers (versus eight)." I reached out to Emil Björnson, Visiting Professor at KTH Royal Institute of Technology and Associate Professor at Linköping University to see if he has explained this in any of his videos. Here is what he said: " I'm not talking about 3GPP terminology in any of my videos. But you can listen to the slides that starts around 12:40 in this video (embedded below) . If you are looking for CSI-RS vs SRS based MU-MIMO, then jump to around 12:40 in this video where you can see CSI-RS being referred to as "grid of beams" and SRS is similar to the other option, which is t